There
was a lot of information in Chapter 1 that I thoroughly enjoyed reading and
learning about. What interested me and caught my eye, was the theoretical
perspectives on human development. Whether it was a psychodynamic theory or a cognitive
theory, there are pieces of every theory that made me question whether I believe
the theory I true or false.
My
3 year old nephew has a slight learning disability. He is not yet able to talk,
so when he trying to communicate what he wants/needs, he often times
gets frustrated when no one is able to understand what he
wants. Which, most times ends in a tantrum. If he is in a room full of adults,
he is doing anything and everything to get the attention on him, usually things
he knows he is not supposed to be doing. Although, when he is around other kids,
such as a preschool or daycare, and sees what they are doing he follows their
lead, and you would never know he was in the room. To me it’s funny how
the environment around you (nature) can affect how one may act.
While
reading through the different theories, one that popped out what the social
learning theory. It referrers to people that watch those around them and
imitate them. Some of us know this as “Monkey see, Monkey do”. I do believe
that plays a huge roll in my nephew’s learning. Once he sees other kids doing
something, he tends to follow and does the same. Even something as simple as
laying down and taking a nap, if he sees other children taking a nap, he will
lay down and also take a nap. For once, when he is around other children he is
not thriving for attention.
Although,
with reading through the different theories, Erik Erikson’s Theory stating that
the life cycle is composed of 8 different stages, I’m not sure if I necessarily
agree with. To me, I feel like some of the stages, is what people may EXPECT of
you at that age. But, with people’s maturity levels being different from one
another, this theory is not necessarily correct for everyone. It’s hard telling
about the early years because obviously, I can’t remember how I was at age 1. According
to his theory, I right now should be committing myself in a loving
relationship. Sure, maybe I have a slow maturity level at age 24 (I don’t think
I do) but my goal right now is school, a relationship right now, is a possibility
of holding me back. His theory could be true for some people, but I don’t think
it is true for everyone. Everyone is different.
The environment around each individual is different in may ways and in how people react to those environment depends on them selves or how they were raised. Like you nephew i totally understand where you are coming from i have a step daughter that acts the same way and it's a learned behavior. However she does act right when reminded to correct that mistake. I think your are correct that everyone learns at the own stage and we all learn from those mistakes or from our surroundings. Everyone is different in their own unique way. :)
ReplyDeleteI've encountered Erikson's theories in previous classes, and I find them to be pretty solid; but (and this is true for any psychological framework) it's just a starting point. When you describe any individual experience you talk about how they deviate from the norm. You're 24, you're nowhere close to the 'committed relationship' step - that doesn't make the theory untrue, any more than saying the average height of an adult white male can't be 5'10" since I am not 5'10".
ReplyDeleteI think "is it true" is less important than "is it useful" - does the theory provide a useful starting point for exploring the wildly different experiences of each individual?
- Ben
Sorry, one more thing - Erikson was publishing this stuff in 1950. It's a different era, with different social expectations for hitting these development milestones. I think that has to have an effect.
Delete